patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Falmouth Resident Weighs in on Article 42

Falmouth resident Mark Cool wants Wind One and Wind Two shut down and is supporting Town Meeting Article 42.

 

The Town Warrant Article #42 received an indefinite postponement from Selectmen, because they await recommendations from board commissioned 'Wind Turbine Options Process' group.  

As a Citizen, the American people, by and large, are a very resourceful people.  Falmouth is no exception.  The great majority of people here have individual initiative.  There are acceptions.  We all know who they are.  But over the years and through the problems, we have struggled through them.  Because we have initiative to solve problems.

If there’s one thing, however, that I’ve found in my lifetime, that will quickly knock down the resourcefulness of an individual, that will absolutely bury individual initiative - it's Bureaucracy!

You see bureaucrats think they’re smarter than us.  Bureaucrats see a problem and they have to form a committee to figure out what to do.  Two years down the road, the problem is still there and they’ve got to form another committee to over-see the first committee.  When the problem is still there, they’ve got to past a resolution to give themselves permission to study the problem that got them to where they were in the first place.  Simply put, it takes bureaucrats an hour and a half to watch "60 minutes".

There is a problem in Falmouth that we’ve faced for 2 1/2 years.  There’s no local, state or federal guide that addresses “How to mitigate health problems caused by wind turbines placed too close to homes”.  If there were, would it say… host a “kick-off” meeting (2010) between residents and local officials to facilitate a clearer understanding of the problem.  If that doesn’t work, go to sub section “B”.   Wait a year, then host two Wind Information meetings (2011) that present reasons why there is no problem.  If that doesn’t work, go to subsection “C”.   Wait another year, then host an emergency public health meeting (2012) to repeat the problems identified at the “kick-off” meeting?  Subsection “A1”, all the while, suggests putting the concern to a special permitting process, but since that was bypassed, it suggests placing the problem into the hands of Town Meeting.  

And so… here we are again!

My point – there is no such guide!  Individual initiative is what will get this problem fixed.  We all have a stake in this.  Not as a Town Meeting representative, but rather as belonging to an order much more important and larger than a bureaucratic political body.  

We are neighbors, friends, fathers, mothers, sons and daughters.  We might not know details of all the articles on the warrant, but we know, understand and can respect the basics of the human condition.

It’s time!  

It’s time, as Americans, as Falmouth neighbors, as decent human beings, to use our individual initiative, and fix this problem once and for all.  It’s time to repair the harm and to get on with the next challenge.  It’s time individual initiative and morale fiber, not bureaucracy, guide our conscience and our vote.

Please support Article 42.  Shut down the Wind turbines! 

Related Topics: Article 42, Letter to the Editor, Mark Cool, Wind Turbines, and falmouth

windpower

8:31 am on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Mr Cool
May I use your quote " an hour and a half to watch sixty minutes ."
LOVE IT

Reply

mark cool

5:06 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

certainly you may - enjoy & be safe out there

Reply

Blowin Smoke

9:25 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

What exactly are we trying to fix here? A handful of folks seem determined to oppose the turbines. Most neighbors have NO problem. The complaints are squirrely... we no longer hear comparisons to "jet engines" since the loudest sound measured by DEP (at just one home) is comparable to a refrigerator running! The DEP specialist is quoted in 10/30/12 Enterprise: "It's not a health issue, it's a comfort issue". If you want to wring hands about energy, you should be looking at Pilgrim nuclear, and the filthy Brayton Point plant - not fighting clean renewables over fictional health issues.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Willis Montgomery III

10:25 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

This is classic. the nocebo effect! LOL. No one seems to mind the non power generating Harley Davidson Wind Turbines, built to make extra noise. Oh wait, that's the sound of 'merican freedom, so it's ok type noise.

mark cool

7:38 am on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Blowin Smoke - This Simon Chapman fellow Colbert refers on his “show” is best known as an anti-smoking crusader.  He is also the lead singer in a rock band.   I’ve taken your advise & looked into Dr. Chapman’s history.  He spews all the standard industry tripe, produced by people who have never left their offices.  He argues the same rhetoric about the cell phone panic, along with several factors that make these panics more likely, i.e. involuntary exposure, artificial nature of the exposure and trustworthiness of the developer. 
While rooting around I came across an earlier Chapman article (http://www.psandman.com/articles/chapman1.htm), Not in our Back Yard, published on the web site of Peter Sandman (http://www.psandman.com/), who is apparently a noted figure in risk management and communication and he has a fair amount of application to wind turbines.
So I spend some time on Sandman’s site.  It is too bad that Chapman didn’t.  One of the article was Managing Justified Outrage:  Outrage Management When Your Opponents Are Substantively Right (http://www.psandman.com/col/justified.htm).

Reply

mark cool

7:39 am on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

One of Sandman’s examples was, you guessed it, wind turbines!  Below is a quote from the section on wind turbines.
“…wind farms are rotten neighbors. They’re ugly, they’re noisy, and they come with transmission lines attached (or what’s the point?).”
So here’s Sandman admitting that wind farms are noisy (easily translating to unhealthy), and that the opposition to them is rational.  Sandman goes on to discuss strategies for lessening the opposition and it makes for interesting reading.  He uses the wind turbines as an example here as well. However, he makes a major mistake in doing so – he accepts the notion that wind energy is good for the overall environment.  Too bad he, like you and Mr. Colbert, hasn’t read more!

Reply

Leave a comment